Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench · Verified Judgements

Case History

Published High Court orders where Adv. Onkar Pandey appeared as counsel. All citations verified on Indian Kanoon.

15+ Cases Listed2022–2025All Verified on Indian KanoonMultiple Practice Areas

Curated from 400+ published orders · Full record ↗

7

Bail Granted

2

FIR Quashed

3

Sentences Reduced to Probation

2

Petitions Defended / Won

Category:
Year:
January 2025QUASHED

Akash Pandey And Another vs State of U.P.

2025:AHC-LKO:5796

Counsel for ApplicantFIR Quashing

Sections 376, 313, 323, 504, 506 IPC; Section 528 BNSS

The entire criminal proceedings arising out of Case Crime No. 163 of 2022 are liable to be quashed. Accordingly are hereby quashed qua the applicants.

Criminal proceedings including rape allegations (S.376 IPC) quashed in full at Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
May 2025DEFENDED

Brijendra Pratap Singh vs State of U.P.

2025:AHC-LKO:30907

Counsel for RespondentsProperty & Writ

U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953

Accordingly, present petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Successfully defended client against writ petition — petition dismissed by the High Court.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
April 2025RELIEF GRANTED

Gaya Prasad vs Tehsildar, Tehsil Mihipurwa, Bahraich

2025:AHC-LKO:24308

Counsel for PetitionerProperty & Writ

Article 227 Constitution; Section 34 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006

The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite party No.1/Tehsildar to consider and decide the Case No.1886 of 2025 most expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months.

High Court directed revenue authority to decide property mutation case on priority within 3 months.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
March 2025QUASHED

Renu Yadav vs State of U.P.

2025:AHC-LKO:15521

Counsel for Opposite Party No. 2FIR Quashing

Sections 427, 452, 504, 506 IPC; Section 528 BNSS

The present application is liable to be allowed as chances of ultimate conviction are extremely bleak and hence no useful purpose would be served by allowing the criminal proceedings to continue.

Criminal proceedings quashed — High Court found no useful purpose in continuing prosecution.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
December 2024BAIL GRANTED

Trayudh Nath Shukla @ Chirkut vs State of U.P.

2024:AHC-LKO:80471

Counsel for ApplicantBail Application

Sections 323, 452, 302 IPC (Murder)

I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

Bail granted in murder case (Section 302 IPC) at Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
August 2024SENTENCE REDUCED

Shamsheer Kumar vs State of U.P.

2024:AHC-LKO:59258

Counsel for AppellantCriminal Appeal

Sections 363, 366, 302, 308, 201/34 IPC; Probation of Offenders Act 1958

The conviction of the appellant Shamsheer Kumar is maintained but the sentence is modified. He is given benefit of Section 4 of The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.

Imprisonment sentence converted to probation under Probation of Offenders Act — client walks free.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
April 2024BAIL GRANTED

Vimal Pandey vs State of U.P.

2024:AHC-LKO:29846

Counsel for ApplicantBail Application

Sections 363, 376D, 342, 506 IPC; POCSO Act Sections 5/6; SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(v)

I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

Bail secured in multi-section case including POCSO (Sections 5/6), gang rape (376D), and SC/ST Act — among the most serious criminal matters.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
March 2024BAIL GRANTED

Shivam Sharma vs State of U.P.

2024:AHC-LKO:21321

Counsel for ApplicantBail Application

Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC; POCSO Act Sections 3/4

The applicant Shivam Sharma be released on bail on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties.

Bail granted in POCSO (Sections 3/4) and rape (Section 376) case at Lucknow Bench.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
March 2024ACQUITTAL UPHELD

State of U.P. vs Ram Sahai And 5 Others

2024:AHC-LKO:22428-DB

Counsel for Respondents (Accused)Criminal Appeal

Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 IPC (Attempt to Murder)

The appeal lacks merit, which deserves to be dismissed and the same is hereby dismissed.

State's appeal against acquittal dismissed — Onkar Pandey's clients retain their acquittal in attempt to murder (S.307) case.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
March 2024BAIL GRANTED

Jitendra @ Monu Nishad vs State of U.P.

2024:AHC-LKO:21915

Counsel for ApplicantBail Application

Sections 323, 325, 367, 368, 504 IPC

The instant anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. He shall be released forthwith on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/-.

Anticipatory bail granted in kidnapping (Section 367) case — client protected from arrest.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
October 2023BAIL GRANTED

Sanjeev Kumar Gupta vs State of U.P.

2023:AHC-LKO:71328

Counsel for ApplicantBail Application

Sections 304, 504 IPC (Culpable Homicide)

The applicant is entitled to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions.

Bail granted in culpable homicide (Section 304 IPC) case.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
September 2023SENTENCE REDUCED

Rafiq vs State of U.P.

2023:AHC-LKO:60526

Counsel for AppellantCriminal Appeal

Sections 307, 34, 109 IPC (Attempt to Murder); Probation of Offenders Act 1958

The conviction of the appellant Rafiq is maintained but the sentence is modified. He is given benefit of Section 4 of The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.

Imprisonment in attempt to murder (S.307) case converted to probation — effective release.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
August 2023SENTENCE REDUCED

Ram Prasad And 2 Others vs State of U.P.

2023:AHC-LKO:57049

Counsel for AppellantsCriminal Appeal

Sections 307, 34, 308 IPC (Attempt to Murder); Probation of Offenders Act 1958

The conviction of the appellants Ram Prasad and Ram Sagar is maintained but the sentence is modified. They are given benefit of Section 4 of The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.

Two co-accused in attempt to murder case — prison sentences converted to probation at Lucknow Bench.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
May 2023BAIL GRANTED

Brij Kishor Maurya vs State of U.P.

2023:AHC-LKO:36798

Counsel for AppellantBail Application

Sections 323, 504, 506, 326 IPC; SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(2)

The appeal is allowed. Consequently, the impugned order dated 14.09.2022 is hereby set aside. The appellant shall be released on bail.

Bail appeal allowed — lower court's rejection set aside. Bail granted in SC/ST Act case.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗
February 2023BAIL GRANTED

Akash Pandey vs State of U.P.

Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1496 of 2022

Counsel for ApplicantBail Application

Sections 376, 313, 323, 504, 506 IPC

In view of the aforesaid, the application is allowed. The accused applicant is directed to surrender before trial court and shall be released on bail.

Anticipatory bail secured in rape (Section 376 IPC) case — one of the most sensitive criminal matters.

View on Indian Kanoon ↗

Showing 15 of 15 cases

Independently Verifiable

Every case listed here is publicly available on Indian Kanoon, India’s largest free legal database. You can verify Advocate Onkar Pandey’s appearance as counsel by clicking “View on Indian Kanoon” on any case above.

Search Adv. Onkar Pandey on Indian Kanoon

Facing Criminal Charges? Get Experienced Representation.

25+ years at Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. Bail, FIR quashing, criminal appeals.